🔗 Share this article

Keir Starmer is facing backbench anger after ministers dropped proposals to give workers immediate safeguards against unfair dismissal, a U-turn that breaches the party's election pledges.

MPs Voice Concerns

Lawmakers featuring a previous cabinet member who spearheaded the employment rights bill expressed apprehension regarding the retreat declared by ministers.

Ministers have axed the proposal to eliminate the two-year waiting requirement for workers to make an unfair dismissal claim and permit them to act starting immediately in a new job, in an attempt to pass the legislation through parliament.

Parliamentary Standoff

The proposal found itself in a confrontation among upper and lower chambers over the original plan to provide employee safeguards from the start, along with provisions to ban "exploitative" zero-hours contracts.

The government now intends to establish the protection over unfair dismissal following half a year employment as an alternative, whereas other immediate protections to parental leave and health-related payments are still due to go ahead, becoming active in the second quarter of 2026.

Backlash and Criticism

The elected official for the northeastern constituency described the move as a "total abandonment" and vowed to push for its cancellation.

"We are unable to endorse that halfway measure."

"This is a wrong-headed move and I will campaign to reverse this让步."

An additional parliamentarian shared concern concerning inadequate dialogue, stating: "There has been zero consultation with party members. The Lords don't have primacy concerning campaign pledges, hence what prompted our让步?"

Wider Consequences

Another representative stated: "Employers have nothing to fear from day-one rights, however laborers face significant risks from companies who resists first-day entitlements."

The ex-labor secretary asserted that the decision "clearly represents a broken promise."

Administration Defense

The education secretary stated there was a "very real prospect" the implementation of the worker protection legislation might have faced postponement without the cabinet's decision regarding a reversal concerning day one protections against unjust firing.

"There has been discussion on the point around unfair dismissal and the time period with employers, the TUC and ministers, and after those talks there's been agreement concerning future direction, that demonstrates progress."

She emphasized that "It means that the time limit will come down from 24 months to half a year, and that runs alongside important day-one rights around sick pay and concerning childbirth absence."

"However the danger present that if we didn't make progress, those important rights might not be implemented from April next year."

Following inquiry concerning whether it amounted to a broken promise, the official replied: "Within the election platform, the promise indicated was that we planned to cooperate with labor organizations, with employers, with community groups, in consulting on such entitlements that we'd be bringing forward."

"Consequently, dual elements remain to that, in the election platform, the significant entitlements and the consultation."